Synced 79 commits from EveryInc/compound-engineering-plugin upstream while
preserving fork-specific customizations (Python/FastAPI pivot, Zoominfo-internal
review agents, deploy-wiring operational lessons, custom personas).
## Triage decisions (15 conflicts resolved)
Keep deleted (7) -- fork already removed these in prior cleanups:
- agents/design/{design-implementation-reviewer,design-iterator,figma-design-sync}
(no fork successor; backend-Python focus doesn't need UI/Figma agents)
- agents/docs/ankane-readme-writer (replaced by python-package-readme-writer)
- agents/review/{data-migration-expert,performance-oracle,security-sentinel}
(replaced by *-reviewer naming convention: data-migrations-reviewer,
performance-reviewer, security-reviewer)
Keep local (1):
- agents/workflow/lint.md (Python tooling: ruff/mypy/djlint/bandit; upstream
deleted the file). Fixed pre-existing duplicate "2." numbering bug.
Restore from upstream (1):
- agents/review/data-integrity-guardian.md (kept for GDPR/CCPA privacy
compliance angle not covered by data-migrations-reviewer)
Merge both (6) -- upstream structural wins layered with fork intent:
- agents/research/best-practices-researcher.md (upstream <examples> removal +
fork's Rails/Ruby -> Python/FastAPI translations)
- skills/ce-brainstorm/SKILL.md (universal-brainstorming routing + Slack
context + non-obvious angles + fork's Deploy wiring flag)
- skills/ce-plan/SKILL.md (universal-planning routing + planning-bootstrap +
fork's two Deploy wiring check bullets)
- skills/ce-review/SKILL.md (Run ID, model tiering haiku->sonnet, compact-JSON
artifact contract, file-type awareness, cli-readiness-reviewer + fork's
zip-agent-validator, design-conformance-reviewer, Stage 6 Zip Agent
Validation)
- skills/ce-review/references/persona-catalog.md (cli-readiness row + adversarial
refinement + fork's Language & Framework Conditional layer; 22 personas total)
- skills/ce-work/SKILL.md (Parallel Safety Check, parallel-subagent constraints,
Phase 3-4 compression + fork's deploy-values self-review row, with duplicate
checklist bullet collapsed to single occurrence)
## Auto-applied (no triage needed)
- 225 remote-only files: accepted as-is (new docs, brainstorms, plans,
upstream skills, tests, scripts)
- 70 local-only files: 46 preserved as-is (kieran-python, tiangolo-fastapi,
zip-agent-validator, design-conformance-reviewer, essay/proof commands,
excalidraw-png-export, etc.); 24 stayed deleted (dhh-rails-style,
andrew-kane-gem-writer, dspy-ruby Ruby skills no longer needed)
## README updated
- Removed Design section (3 deleted agents)
- Removed deleted Review entries (data-migration-expert, dhh-rails-reviewer,
kieran-rails-reviewer, performance-oracle, security-sentinel)
- Added new Review entries: design-conformance-reviewer, previous-comments-reviewer,
tiangolo-fastapi-reviewer, zip-agent-validator
- Workflow: added lint
- Docs: replaced ankane-readme-writer with python-package-readme-writer
## Known issues (not introduced by merge decisions)
- 9 detect-project-type.sh tests fail on macOS bash 3.2 (script uses
`declare -A` which requires bash 4+). Upstream regression in commit 070092d
(#568). Resolution: install bash 4+ via `brew install bash` locally;
upstream fix tracked separately.
- 2 review-skill-contract tests reference deleted agents (dhh-rails-reviewer,
data-migration-expert). Pre-existing fork inconsistency, not new.
bun run release:validate: passes (46 agents, 51 skills, 0 MCP servers)
124 lines
4.8 KiB
Markdown
124 lines
4.8 KiB
Markdown
---
|
|
name: todo-create
|
|
description: Use when creating durable work items, managing todo lifecycle, or tracking findings across sessions in the file-based todo system
|
|
disable-model-invocation: true
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
# File-Based Todo Tracking
|
|
|
|
## Overview
|
|
|
|
The `.context/compound-engineering/todos/` directory is a file-based tracking system for code review feedback, technical debt, feature requests, and work items. Each todo is a markdown file with YAML frontmatter.
|
|
|
|
> **Legacy support:** Always check both `.context/compound-engineering/todos/` (canonical) and `todos/` (legacy) when reading. Write new todos only to the canonical path. This directory has a multi-session lifecycle -- do not clean it up as scratch.
|
|
|
|
## Directory Paths
|
|
|
|
| Purpose | Path |
|
|
|---------|------|
|
|
| **Canonical (write here)** | `.context/compound-engineering/todos/` |
|
|
| **Legacy (read-only)** | `todos/` |
|
|
|
|
## File Naming Convention
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
{issue_id}-{status}-{priority}-{description}.md
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
- **issue_id**: Sequential number (001, 002, ...) -- never reused
|
|
- **status**: `pending` | `ready` | `complete`
|
|
- **priority**: `p1` (critical) | `p2` (important) | `p3` (nice-to-have)
|
|
- **description**: kebab-case, brief
|
|
|
|
**Example:** `002-ready-p1-fix-n-plus-1.md`
|
|
|
|
## File Structure
|
|
|
|
Each todo has YAML frontmatter and structured sections. Use the todo template included below when creating new todos.
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
---
|
|
status: ready
|
|
priority: p1
|
|
issue_id: "002"
|
|
tags: [rails, performance]
|
|
dependencies: ["001"] # Issue IDs this is blocked by
|
|
---
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
**Required sections:** Problem Statement, Findings, Proposed Solutions, Recommended Action (filled during triage), Acceptance Criteria, Work Log.
|
|
|
|
**Required for code review findings:** Assessment (Pressure Test) — verify the finding before acting on it.
|
|
|
|
- **Assessment**: Clear & Correct | Unclear | Likely Incorrect | YAGNI
|
|
- **Recommended Action**: Fix now | Clarify | Push back | Skip
|
|
- **Verified**: Code, Tests, Usage, Prior Decisions (Yes/No with details)
|
|
- **Technical Justification**: Why this finding is valid or should be skipped
|
|
|
|
**Optional sections:** Technical Details, Resources, Notes.
|
|
|
|
**Required for code review findings:** Assessment (Pressure Test) — verify the finding before acting on it.
|
|
|
|
- **Assessment**: Clear & Correct | Unclear | Likely Incorrect | YAGNI
|
|
- **Recommended Action**: Fix now | Clarify | Push back | Skip
|
|
- **Verified**: Code, Tests, Usage, Prior Decisions (Yes/No with details)
|
|
- **Technical Justification**: Why this finding is valid or should be skipped
|
|
|
|
## Workflows
|
|
|
|
> **Tool preference:** Use native file-search/glob and content-search tools instead of shell commands for finding and reading todo files. Shell only for operations with no native equivalent (`mv`, `mkdir -p`).
|
|
|
|
### Creating a New Todo
|
|
|
|
1. `mkdir -p .context/compound-engineering/todos/`
|
|
2. Search both paths for `[0-9]*-*.md`, find the highest numeric prefix, increment, zero-pad to 3 digits.
|
|
3. Use the todo template included below, write to canonical path as `{NEXT_ID}-pending-{priority}-{description}.md`.
|
|
4. Fill Problem Statement, Findings, Proposed Solutions, Acceptance Criteria, and initial Work Log entry.
|
|
5. Set status: `pending` (needs triage) or `ready` (pre-approved).
|
|
|
|
**Create a todo when** the work needs more than ~15 minutes, has dependencies, requires planning, or needs prioritization. **Act immediately instead** when the fix is trivial, obvious, and self-contained.
|
|
|
|
### Triaging Pending Items
|
|
|
|
1. Glob `*-pending-*.md` in both paths.
|
|
2. Review each todo's Problem Statement, Findings, and Proposed Solutions.
|
|
3. Approve: rename `pending` -> `ready` in filename and frontmatter, fill Recommended Action.
|
|
4. Defer: leave as `pending`.
|
|
|
|
Load the `todo-triage` skill for an interactive approval workflow.
|
|
|
|
### Managing Dependencies
|
|
|
|
```yaml
|
|
dependencies: ["002", "005"] # Blocked by these issues
|
|
dependencies: [] # No blockers
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
To check blockers: search for `{dep_id}-complete-*.md` in both paths. Missing matches = incomplete blockers.
|
|
|
|
### Completing a Todo
|
|
|
|
1. Verify all acceptance criteria.
|
|
2. Update Work Log with final session.
|
|
3. Rename `ready` -> `complete` in filename and frontmatter.
|
|
4. Check for unblocked work: search for files containing `dependencies:.*"{issue_id}"`.
|
|
|
|
## Integration with Workflows
|
|
|
|
| Trigger | Flow |
|
|
|---------|------|
|
|
| Code review | `/ce:review` -> Findings -> `/todo-triage` -> Todos |
|
|
| Autonomous review | `/ce:review mode:autofix` -> Residual todos -> `/todo-resolve` |
|
|
| Code TODOs | `/todo-resolve` -> Fixes + Complex todos |
|
|
| Planning | Brainstorm -> Create todo -> Work -> Complete |
|
|
|
|
## Key Distinction
|
|
|
|
This skill manages **durable, cross-session work items** persisted as markdown files. For temporary in-session step tracking, use platform task tools (`TaskCreate`/`TaskUpdate` in Claude Code, `update_plan` in Codex) instead.
|
|
|
|
---
|
|
|
|
## Todo Template
|
|
|
|
@./assets/todo-template.md
|