claude-engineering-plugin/plugins/compound-engineering/commands/workflows/work.md

name, description, argument-hint

name	description	argument-hint
workflows:work	Execute work plans efficiently while maintaining quality and finishing features	[plan file, specification, or todo file path]

Work Plan Execution Command

Execute a work plan efficiently while maintaining quality and finishing features.

Introduction

This command takes a work document (plan, specification, or todo file) and executes it systematically. The focus is on shipping complete features by understanding requirements quickly, following existing patterns, and maintaining quality throughout.

Input Document

<input_document> #$ARGUMENTS </input_document>

Execution Workflow

Phase 1: Quick Start

1. Read Plan and Clarify

   • Read the work document completely
   • Review any references or links provided in the plan
   • If anything is unclear or ambiguous, ask clarifying questions now
   • Get user approval to proceed
   • Do not skip this - better to ask questions now than build the wrong thing

2. Setup Environment

   Choose your work style:

   Option A: Live work on current branch

   git checkout main && git pull origin main
   git checkout -b feature-branch-name
   

   Option B: Parallel work with worktree (recommended for parallel development)

   # Ask user first: "Work in parallel with worktree or on current branch?"
   # If worktree:
   skill: git-worktree
   # The skill will create a new branch from main in an isolated worktree
   

   Recommendation: Use worktree if:

   • You want to work on multiple features simultaneously
   • You want to keep main clean while experimenting
   • You plan to switch between branches frequently

   Use live branch if:

   • You're working on a single feature
   • You prefer staying in the main repository

3. Create Todo List

   • Use TodoWrite to break plan into actionable tasks
   • Include dependencies between tasks
   • Prioritize based on what needs to be done first
   • Include testing and quality check tasks
   • Keep tasks specific and completable

Phase 2: Execute

1. Task Execution Loop

   For each task in priority order:

   while (tasks remain):
     - Mark task as in_progress in TodoWrite
     - Read any referenced files from the plan
     - Look for similar patterns in codebase
     - Implement following existing conventions
     - Write tests for new functionality
     - Run tests after changes
     - Mark task as completed
   

2. Follow Existing Patterns

   • The plan should reference similar code - read those files first
   • Match naming conventions exactly
   • Reuse existing components where possible
   • Follow project coding standards (see CLAUDE.md)
   • When in doubt, grep for similar implementations

3. Test Continuously

   • Run relevant tests after each significant change
   • Don't wait until the end to test
   • Fix failures immediately
   • Add new tests for new functionality

4. Figma Design Sync (if applicable)

   For UI work with Figma designs:

   • Implement components following design specs
   • Use figma-design-sync agent iteratively to compare
   • Fix visual differences identified
   • Repeat until implementation matches design

5. Track Progress

   • Keep TodoWrite updated as you complete tasks
   • Note any blockers or unexpected discoveries
   • Create new tasks if scope expands
   • Keep user informed of major milestones

Phase 3: Quality Check

1. Run Core Quality Checks

   Always run before submitting:

   # Run full test suite
   bin/rails test
   
   # Run linting (per CLAUDE.md)
   # Use linting-agent before pushing to origin
   

2. Consider Reviewer Agents (Optional)

   Use for complex, risky, or large changes:

   • code-simplicity-reviewer: Check for unnecessary complexity
   • kieran-rails-reviewer: Verify Rails conventions (Rails projects)
   • performance-oracle: Check for performance issues
   • security-sentinel: Scan for security vulnerabilities
   • cora-test-reviewer: Review test quality (CORA projects)

   Run reviewers in parallel with Task tool:

   Task(code-simplicity-reviewer): "Review changes for simplicity"
   Task(kieran-rails-reviewer): "Check Rails conventions"
   

   Present findings to user and address critical issues.

3. Final Validation

   • All TodoWrite tasks marked completed
   • All tests pass
   • Linting passes
   • Code follows existing patterns
   • Figma designs match (if applicable)
   • No console errors or warnings

Phase 4: Ship It

1. Create Commit

   git add .
   git status  # Review what's being committed
   git diff --staged  # Check the changes
   
   # Commit with conventional format
   git commit -m "$(cat <<'EOF'
   feat(scope): description of what and why
   
   Brief explanation if needed.
   
   🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
   
   Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
   EOF
   )"
   

2. Capture and Upload Screenshots for UI Changes (REQUIRED for any UI work)

   For any design changes, new views, or UI modifications, you MUST capture and upload screenshots:

   Step 1: Start dev server (if not running)

   bin/dev  # Run in background
   

   Step 2: Capture screenshots with agent-browser CLI

   agent-browser open http://localhost:3000/[route]
   agent-browser snapshot -i
   agent-browser screenshot output.png
   

   See the agent-browser skill for detailed usage.

   Step 3: Upload using imgup skill

   skill: imgup
   # Then upload each screenshot:
   imgup -h pixhost screenshot.png  # pixhost works without API key
   # Alternative hosts: catbox, imagebin, beeimg
   

   What to capture:

   • New screens: Screenshot of the new UI
   • Modified screens: Before AND after screenshots
   • Design implementation: Screenshot showing Figma design match

   IMPORTANT: Always include uploaded image URLs in PR description. This provides visual context for reviewers and documents the change.

3. Create Pull Request

   git push -u origin feature-branch-name
   
   gh pr create --title "Feature: [Description]" --body "$(cat <<'EOF'
   ## Summary
   - What was built
   - Why it was needed
   - Key decisions made
   
   ## Testing
   - Tests added/modified
   - Manual testing performed
   
   ## Before / After Screenshots
   | Before | After |
   |--------|-------|
   | ![before](URL) | ![after](URL) |
   
   ## Figma Design
   [Link if applicable]
   
   🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
   EOF
   )"
   

4. Notify User

   • Summarize what was completed
   • Link to PR
   • Note any follow-up work needed
   • Suggest next steps if applicable

---

Key Principles

Start Fast, Execute Faster

• Get clarification once at the start, then execute
• Don't wait for perfect understanding - ask questions and move
• The goal is to finish the feature, not create perfect process

The Plan is Your Guide

• Work documents should reference similar code and patterns
• Load those references and follow them
• Don't reinvent - match what exists

Test As You Go

• Run tests after each change, not at the end
• Fix failures immediately
• Continuous testing prevents big surprises

Quality is Built In

• Follow existing patterns
• Write tests for new code
• Run linting before pushing
• Use reviewer agents for complex/risky changes only

Ship Complete Features

• Mark all tasks completed before moving on
• Don't leave features 80% done
• A finished feature that ships beats a perfect feature that doesn't

Quality Checklist

Before creating PR, verify:

• All clarifying questions asked and answered
• All TodoWrite tasks marked completed
• Tests pass (run bin/rails test)
• Linting passes (use linting-agent)
• Code follows existing patterns
• Figma designs match implementation (if applicable)
• Before/after screenshots captured and uploaded (for UI changes)
• Commit messages follow conventional format
• PR description includes summary, testing notes, and screenshots

When to Use Reviewer Agents

Don't use by default. Use reviewer agents only when:

• Large refactor affecting many files (10+)
• Security-sensitive changes (authentication, permissions, data access)
• Performance-critical code paths
• Complex algorithms or business logic
• User explicitly requests thorough review

For most features: tests + linting + following patterns is sufficient.

Common Pitfalls to Avoid

• Analysis paralysis - Don't overthink, read the plan and execute
• Skipping clarifying questions - Ask now, not after building wrong thing
• Ignoring plan references - The plan has links for a reason
• Testing at the end - Test continuously or suffer later
• Forgetting TodoWrite - Track progress or lose track of what's done
• 80% done syndrome - Finish the feature, don't move on early
• Over-reviewing simple changes - Save reviewer agents for complex work