eb96e32c58
Incorporates 163 upstream commits (origin/main) while preserving all local skills, agents, and commands. Metadata descriptions updated to reflect actual component counts (30 agents, 56 skills, 7 commands). file-todos/SKILL.md merged with both upstream command rename and local assessment fields. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2.0 KiB
2.0 KiB
name, description, allowed-tools
| name | description | allowed-tools |
|---|---|---|
| john-voice | This skill should be used whenever writing content that should sound like John Lamb wrote it. It applies to all written output including Slack messages, emails, Jira tickets, technical docs, prose, blog posts, cover letters, and any other communication. This skill provides John's authentic writing voice, tone, and style patterns organized by venue and audience. Other skills should invoke this skill when producing written content on John's behalf. Triggers on any content generation, drafting, or editing task where the output represents John's voice. | Read |
John's Writing Voice
This skill captures John Lamb's authentic writing voice for use across all written content. It is a reference skill designed to be called by other skills or used directly whenever producing text that should sound like John wrote it.
How to Use This Skill
- Determine the venue and audience for the content being produced
- Load
references/core-voice.md— this always applies regardless of context - Load the appropriate venue-specific tone guide from
references/:- Prose, essays, blog posts →
references/prose-essays.md - Slack messages, quick emails, casual comms →
references/casual-messages.md - Technical docs, Jira tickets, PRs, code reviews →
references/professional-technical.md - Cover letters, LinkedIn, formal professional →
references/formal-professional.md - Personal reflection, journal, notes →
references/personal-reflection.md
- Prose, essays, blog posts →
- Apply both the core voice and the venue-specific guide when drafting content
- Review the output against the core voice principles — if it sounds like an AI wrote it, rewrite it
Key Principle
John prizes simplicity and clarity above all else. He writes to convey meaning, not to sound smart. If the output uses words John wouldn't say aloud to a friend, it's wrong. If it obscures meaning behind fancy language, it's wrong. If it sounds like a corporate press release or a ChatGPT default (NO emdashes!), it's catastrophically wrong.