claude-engineering-plugin/plugins/compound-engineering/skills/ce-code-review/references/review-output-template.md

Code Review Output Template

Use this exact format when presenting synthesized review findings. Findings are grouped by severity, not by reviewer.

IMPORTANT: Use pipe-delimited markdown tables (| col | col |). Do NOT use ASCII box-drawing characters.

Example

## Code Review Results

**Scope:** merge-base with the review base branch -> working tree (14 files, 342 lines)
**Intent:** Add order export endpoint with CSV and JSON format support
**Mode:** autofix

**Reviewers:** correctness, testing, maintainability, security, api-contract
- security -- new public endpoint accepts user-provided format parameter
- api-contract -- new /api/orders/export route with response schema

### P0 -- Critical

| # | File | Issue | Reviewer | Confidence | Route |
|---|------|-------|----------|------------|-------|
| 1 | `orders_controller.rb:42` | User-supplied ID in account lookup without ownership check | security | 100 | `gated_auto -> downstream-resolver` |

### P1 -- High

| # | File | Issue | Reviewer | Confidence | Route |
|---|------|-------|----------|------------|-------|
| 2 | `export_service.rb:87` | Loads all orders into memory -- unbounded for large accounts | performance | 100 | `safe_auto -> review-fixer` |
| 3 | `export_service.rb:91` | No pagination -- response size grows linearly with order count | api-contract, performance | 75 | `manual -> downstream-resolver` |

### P2 -- Moderate

| # | File | Issue | Reviewer | Confidence | Route |
|---|------|-------|----------|------------|-------|
| 4 | `export_service.rb:45` | Missing error handling for CSV serialization failure | correctness | 75 | `safe_auto -> review-fixer` |

### P3 -- Low

| # | File | Issue | Reviewer | Confidence | Route |
|---|------|-------|----------|------------|-------|
| 5 | `export_helper.rb:12` | Format detection could use early return instead of nested conditional | maintainability | 75 | `advisory -> human` |

### Applied Fixes

- `safe_auto`: Added bounded export pagination guard and CSV serialization failure test coverage in this run

### Residual Actionable Work

| # | File | Issue | Route | Next Step |
|---|------|-------|-------|-----------|
| 1 | `orders_controller.rb:42` | Ownership check missing on export lookup | `gated_auto -> downstream-resolver` | Defer via tracker (requires explicit approval before behavior change) |
| 2 | `export_service.rb:91` | Pagination contract needs a broader API decision | `manual -> downstream-resolver` | Defer via tracker with contract and client impact details |

### Pre-existing Issues

| # | File | Issue | Reviewer |
|---|------|-------|----------|
| 1 | `orders_controller.rb:12` | Broad rescue masking failed permission check | correctness |

### Learnings & Past Solutions

- [Known Pattern] `docs/solutions/export-pagination.md` -- previous export pagination fix applies to this endpoint

### Agent-Native Gaps

- New export endpoint has no CLI/agent equivalent -- agent users cannot trigger exports

### Schema Drift Check

- Clean: schema.rb changes match the migrations in scope

### Deployment Notes

- Pre-deploy: capture baseline row counts before enabling the export backfill
- Verify: `SELECT COUNT(*) FROM exports WHERE status IS NULL;` should stay at `0`
- Rollback: keep the old export path available until the backfill has been validated

### Coverage

- Suppressed: 2 findings below anchor 75 (1 at anchor 50, 1 at anchor 25)
- Residual risks: No rate limiting on export endpoint
- Testing gaps: No test for concurrent export requests

---

> **Verdict:** Ready with fixes
>
> **Reasoning:** 1 critical auth bypass must be fixed. The memory/pagination issues (P1) should be addressed for production safety.
>
> **Fix order:** P0 auth bypass -> P1 memory/pagination -> P2 error handling if straightforward

Anti-patterns

Do NOT produce output like this. The following is wrong:

Findings

Sev: P1
File: foo.go:42
Issue: Some problem description
Reviewer(s): adversarial
Confidence: 75
Route: advisory -> human
────────────────────────────────────────
Sev: P2
File: bar.go:99
Issue: Another problem

This fails because: no pipe-delimited tables, no severity-grouped ### headers, uses box-drawing horizontal rules, no numbered findings, no ## Code Review Results title, and the verdict is not in a blockquote. Always use the table format from the example above.

Formatting Rules

• Pipe-delimited markdown tables for findings -- never ASCII box-drawing characters or per-finding horizontal-rule separators between entries (the report-level --- before the verdict is still required)
• Severity-grouped sections -- ### P0 -- Critical, ### P1 -- High, ### P2 -- Moderate, ### P3 -- Low. Omit empty severity levels.
• Always include file:line location for code review issues
• Reviewer column shows which persona(s) flagged the issue. Multiple reviewers = cross-reviewer agreement.
• Confidence column shows the finding's anchor as an integer (50, 75, or 100). Never render as a float.
• Route column shows the synthesized handling decision as <autofix_class> -> <owner>.
• Header includes scope, intent, and reviewer team with per-conditional justifications
• Mode line -- include interactive, autofix, report-only, or headless
• Applied Fixes section -- include only when a fix phase ran in this review invocation
• Residual Actionable Work section -- include only when unresolved actionable findings were handed off for later work
• Pre-existing section -- separate table, no confidence column (these are informational)
• Learnings & Past Solutions section -- results from ce-learnings-researcher, with links to docs/solutions/ files
• Agent-Native Gaps section -- results from ce-agent-native-reviewer. Omit if no gaps found.
• Schema Drift Check section -- results from ce-schema-drift-detector. Omit if the agent did not run.
• Deployment Notes section -- key checklist items from ce-deployment-verification-agent. Omit if the agent did not run.
• Coverage section -- suppressed count, residual risks, testing gaps, failed reviewers
• Summary uses blockquotes for verdict, reasoning, and fix order
• Horizontal rule (---) separates findings from verdict
• ### headers for each section -- never plain text headers

Headless Mode Format

In mode:headless, replace the interactive pipe-delimited table report with a structured text envelope. The headless format is defined in the ### Headless output format section of SKILL.md. Key differences from the interactive format:

• No pipe-delimited tables. Findings use [severity][autofix_class -> owner] File: <file:line> -- <title> line format with indented Why/Evidence/Suggested fix lines.
• Findings grouped by autofix_class (gated-auto, manual, advisory) instead of severity. Within each group, findings are sorted by severity.
• Verdict in header (top of output) instead of bottom, so programmatic callers get it first.
• Artifact: line in metadata header gives callers the path to the full run artifact.
• [needs-verification] marker on findings where requires_verification: true.
• Evidence lines included per finding.
• Completion signal: "Review complete" as the final line.