--- name: essay-outline description: Transform a brain dump into a story-structured essay outline. Pressure tests the idea, validates story structure using the Saunders framework, and produces a tight outline written to file. argument-hint: "[brain dump — your raw ideas, however loose]" --- # Essay Outline Turn a brain dump into a story-structured essay outline. ## Brain Dump #$ARGUMENTS **If the brain dump above is empty, ask the user:** "What's the idea? Paste your brain dump — however raw or loose." Do not proceed until you have a brain dump. ## Execution ### Phase 1: Idea Triage Read the brain dump and locate the potential thesis — the single thing worth saying. Ask: would a smart, skeptical reader finish this essay and think "I needed that"? Play devil's advocate. This is the primary job. Look for: - **Weak thesis** — Is this a real insight, or just a topic? A topic is not a thesis. "Remote work is complicated" is a topic. "Remote work didn't fail the office — the office failed remote work" is a thesis. - **Missing payoff** — What does the reader walk away with that they didn't have before? If there's no answer, say so. - **Broken connective tissue** — Do the ideas connect causally ("and therefore") or just sequentially ("and another thing")? Sequential ideas are a list, not an essay. - **Unsupported claims** — Use outside research to pressure-test assertions. If a claim doesn't hold up, flag it and explore whether it can be rescued. **If nothing survives triage:** Say directly — "There's nothing here yet." Then ask one question aimed at finding a salvageable core. Do not produce an outline for an idea that hasn't earned one. **If the idea survives but has weaknesses:** Identify the weakest link and collaboratively generate a fix before moving to Phase 2. ### Phase 2: Story Structure Check Load the `story-lens` skill. Apply the Saunders framework to the *idea* — not prose. The essay may not involve characters. That's fine. Translate the framework as follows: | Saunders diagnostic | Applied to essay ideas | |---|---| | Beat causality | Does each supporting point *cause* the reader to need the next one, or do they merely follow it? | | Escalation | Does each beat raise the stakes of the thesis — moving the reader further from where they started? | | Story-yet test | If the essay ended after the hook, would anything have changed for the reader? After the first supporting point? Each beat must earn its place. | | Efficiency | Is every idea doing work? Cut anything that elaborates without advancing. | | Expectation | Does each beat land at the right level — surprising but not absurd, inevitable in hindsight? | | Moral/technical unity | If something feels off — a point that doesn't land, a conclusion that feels unearned — find the structural failure underneath. | **The non-negotiables:** - The hook must create a specific expectation that the essay then fulfills or subverts - Supporting beats must escalate — each one should make the thesis harder to dismiss, not just add to it - The conclusion must deliver irreversible change in the reader's understanding — they cannot un-think what the essay showed them Flag any diagnostic failures. For each failure, propose a fix. If the structure cannot be made to escalate, say so. ### Phase 3: Outline Construction Produce the outline only after the idea has survived Phases 1 and 2. **Structure:** - Hook — the opening move that sets an expectation - Supporting beats — each one causal, each one escalating - Conclusion — the irreversible change delivered to the reader **Format rules:** - Bullets and sub-bullets only - Max 3 sub-bullets per bullet - No sub-sub-bullets - Each bullet is a *beat*, not a topic — it should imply forward motion - Keep it short. A good outline is a skeleton, not a draft. **Write the outline to file:** ``` docs/outlines/YYYY-MM-DD-[slug].md ``` Ensure `docs/outlines/` exists before writing. The slug should be 3-5 words derived from the thesis, hyphenated. ## Output Summary When complete, display: ``` Outline complete. File: docs/outlines/YYYY-MM-DD-[slug].md Thesis: [one sentence] Story verdict: [passes / passes with fixes / nothing here] Key structural moves: - [Hook strategy] - [How the beats escalate] - [What the conclusion delivers] ```