john/claude-engineering-plugin
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions 3 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Reduce context token usage by 79% — fix silent component exclusion (#161)

Browse Source 
* Update create-agent-skills to match 2026 official docs, add /triage-prs command

- Rewrite SKILL.md to document that commands and skills are now merged
- Add new frontmatter fields: disable-model-invocation, user-invocable, context, agent
- Add invocation control table and dynamic context injection docs
- Fix skill-structure.md: was incorrectly recommending XML tags over markdown headings
- Update official-spec.md with complete 2026 specification
- Add local /triage-prs command for PR triage workflow
- Add PR triage plan document

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* [2.31.0] Reduce context token usage by 79%, include recent community contributions

The plugin was consuming 316% of Claude Code's description character budget
(~50,500 chars vs 16,000 limit), causing components to be silently excluded.
Now at 65% (~10,400 chars) with all components visible.

Changes:
- Trim all 29 agent descriptions (move examples to body)
- Add disable-model-invocation to 18 manual commands
- Add disable-model-invocation to 6 manual skills
- Include recent community contributions in changelog
- Fix component counts (29 agents, 24 commands, 18 skills)

Contributors: @trevin, @terryli, @robertomello, @zacwilliams,
@aarnikoskela, @samxie, @davidalley

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Fix: keep disable-model-invocation off commands called by /lfg, rename xcode-test

- Remove disable-model-invocation from test-browser, feature-video,
  resolve_todo_parallel — these are called programmatically by /lfg and /slfg
- Rename xcode-test to test-xcode to match test-browser naming convention

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Fix: keep git-worktree skill auto-invocable (used by /workflows:work)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat(converter): support disable-model-invocation frontmatter

Parse disable-model-invocation from command and skill frontmatter.
Commands/skills with this flag are excluded from OpenCode command maps
and Codex prompt/skill generation, matching Claude Code behavior where
these components are user-only invocable.

Bump converter version to 0.3.0.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Kieran Klaassen
2026-02-08 22:28:51 -06:00
committed by GitHub
parent 04ee7e4506
commit f744b797ef
71 changed files with 1765 additions and 767 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

17
plugins/compound-engineering/agents/workflow/pr-comment-resolver.md
View File

@@ -1,10 +1,25 @@
---
name: pr-comment-resolver
description: "Use this agent when you need to address comments on pull requests or code reviews by making the requested changes and reporting back on the resolution. This agent handles the full workflow of understanding the comment, implementing the fix, and providing a clear summary of what was done. <example>Context: A reviewer has left a comment on a pull request asking for a specific change to be made.user: \"The reviewer commented that we should add error handling to the payment processing method\"assistant: \"I'll use the pr-comment-resolver agent to address this comment by implementing the error handling and reporting back\"<commentary>Since there's a PR comment that needs to be addressed with code changes, use the pr-comment-resolver agent to handle the implementation and resolution.</commentary></example><example>Context: Multiple code review comments need to be addressed systematically.user: \"Can you fix the issues mentioned in the code review? They want better variable names and to extract the validation logic\"assistant: \"Let me use the pr-comment-resolver agent to address these review comments one by one\"<commentary>The user wants to resolve code review feedback, so the pr-comment-resolver agent should handle making the changes and reporting on each resolution.</commentary></example>"
description: "Addresses PR review comments by implementing requested changes and reporting resolutions. Use when code review feedback needs to be resolved with code changes."
color: blue
model: inherit
---
<examples>
<example>
Context: A reviewer has left a comment on a pull request asking for a specific change to be made.
user: "The reviewer commented that we should add error handling to the payment processing method"
assistant: "I'll use the pr-comment-resolver agent to address this comment by implementing the error handling and reporting back"
<commentary>Since there's a PR comment that needs to be addressed with code changes, use the pr-comment-resolver agent to handle the implementation and resolution.</commentary>
</example>
<example>
Context: Multiple code review comments need to be addressed systematically.
user: "Can you fix the issues mentioned in the code review? They want better variable names and to extract the validation logic"
assistant: "Let me use the pr-comment-resolver agent to address these review comments one by one"
<commentary>The user wants to resolve code review feedback, so the pr-comment-resolver agent should handle making the changes and reporting on each resolution.</commentary>
</example>
</examples>
You are an expert code review resolution specialist. Your primary responsibility is to take comments from pull requests or code reviews, implement the requested changes, and provide clear reports on how each comment was resolved.
When you receive a comment or review feedback, you will: