Reduce context token usage by 79% — fix silent component exclusion (#161)

* Update create-agent-skills to match 2026 official docs, add /triage-prs command

- Rewrite SKILL.md to document that commands and skills are now merged
- Add new frontmatter fields: disable-model-invocation, user-invocable, context, agent
- Add invocation control table and dynamic context injection docs
- Fix skill-structure.md: was incorrectly recommending XML tags over markdown headings
- Update official-spec.md with complete 2026 specification
- Add local /triage-prs command for PR triage workflow
- Add PR triage plan document

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* [2.31.0] Reduce context token usage by 79%, include recent community contributions

The plugin was consuming 316% of Claude Code's description character budget
(~50,500 chars vs 16,000 limit), causing components to be silently excluded.
Now at 65% (~10,400 chars) with all components visible.

Changes:
- Trim all 29 agent descriptions (move examples to body)
- Add disable-model-invocation to 18 manual commands
- Add disable-model-invocation to 6 manual skills
- Include recent community contributions in changelog
- Fix component counts (29 agents, 24 commands, 18 skills)

Contributors: @trevin, @terryli, @robertomello, @zacwilliams,
@aarnikoskela, @samxie, @davidalley

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Fix: keep disable-model-invocation off commands called by /lfg, rename xcode-test

- Remove disable-model-invocation from test-browser, feature-video,
  resolve_todo_parallel — these are called programmatically by /lfg and /slfg
- Rename xcode-test to test-xcode to match test-browser naming convention

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* Fix: keep git-worktree skill auto-invocable (used by /workflows:work)

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

* feat(converter): support disable-model-invocation frontmatter

Parse disable-model-invocation from command and skill frontmatter.
Commands/skills with this flag are excluded from OpenCode command maps
and Codex prompt/skill generation, matching Claude Code behavior where
these components are user-only invocable.

Bump converter version to 0.3.0.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

---------

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

plugins/compound-engineering/agents/workflow/bug-reproduction-validator.md

@@ -1,9 +1,24 @@
 ---
 name: bug-reproduction-validator
-description: "Use this agent when you receive a bug report or issue description and need to verify whether the reported behavior is actually a bug. This agent will attempt to reproduce the issue systematically, validate the steps to reproduce, and confirm whether the behavior deviates from expected functionality. <example>\\nContext: The user has reported a potential bug in the application.\\nuser: \"Users are reporting that the email processing fails when there are special characters in the subject line\"\\nassistant: \"I'll use the bug-reproduction-validator agent to verify if this is an actual bug by attempting to reproduce it\"\\n<commentary>\\nSince there's a bug report about email processing with special characters, use the bug-reproduction-validator agent to systematically reproduce and validate the issue.\\n</commentary>\\n</example>\\n<example>\\nContext: An issue has been raised about unexpected behavior.\\nuser: \"There's a report that the brief summary isn't including all emails from today\"\\nassistant: \"Let me launch the bug-reproduction-validator agent to investigate and reproduce this reported issue\"\\n<commentary>\\nA potential bug has been reported about the brief summary functionality, so the bug-reproduction-validator should be used to verify if this is actually a bug.\\n</commentary>\\n</example>"
+description: "Systematically reproduces and validates bug reports to confirm whether reported behavior is an actual bug. Use when you receive a bug report or issue that needs verification."
 model: inherit
 ---
 
+<examples>
+<example>
+Context: The user has reported a potential bug in the application.
+user: "Users are reporting that the email processing fails when there are special characters in the subject line"
+assistant: "I'll use the bug-reproduction-validator agent to verify if this is an actual bug by attempting to reproduce it"
+<commentary>Since there's a bug report about email processing with special characters, use the bug-reproduction-validator agent to systematically reproduce and validate the issue.</commentary>
+</example>
+<example>
+Context: An issue has been raised about unexpected behavior.
+user: "There's a report that the brief summary isn't including all emails from today"
+assistant: "Let me launch the bug-reproduction-validator agent to investigate and reproduce this reported issue"
+<commentary>A potential bug has been reported about the brief summary functionality, so the bug-reproduction-validator should be used to verify if this is actually a bug.</commentary>
+</example>
+</examples>
+
 You are a meticulous Bug Reproduction Specialist with deep expertise in systematic debugging and issue validation. Your primary mission is to determine whether reported issues are genuine bugs or expected behavior/user errors.
 
 When presented with a bug report, you will: