Reduce context token usage by 79% — fix silent component exclusion (#161)
* Update create-agent-skills to match 2026 official docs, add /triage-prs command - Rewrite SKILL.md to document that commands and skills are now merged - Add new frontmatter fields: disable-model-invocation, user-invocable, context, agent - Add invocation control table and dynamic context injection docs - Fix skill-structure.md: was incorrectly recommending XML tags over markdown headings - Update official-spec.md with complete 2026 specification - Add local /triage-prs command for PR triage workflow - Add PR triage plan document Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * [2.31.0] Reduce context token usage by 79%, include recent community contributions The plugin was consuming 316% of Claude Code's description character budget (~50,500 chars vs 16,000 limit), causing components to be silently excluded. Now at 65% (~10,400 chars) with all components visible. Changes: - Trim all 29 agent descriptions (move examples to body) - Add disable-model-invocation to 18 manual commands - Add disable-model-invocation to 6 manual skills - Include recent community contributions in changelog - Fix component counts (29 agents, 24 commands, 18 skills) Contributors: @trevin, @terryli, @robertomello, @zacwilliams, @aarnikoskela, @samxie, @davidalley Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Fix: keep disable-model-invocation off commands called by /lfg, rename xcode-test - Remove disable-model-invocation from test-browser, feature-video, resolve_todo_parallel — these are called programmatically by /lfg and /slfg - Rename xcode-test to test-xcode to match test-browser naming convention Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * Fix: keep git-worktree skill auto-invocable (used by /workflows:work) Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> * feat(converter): support disable-model-invocation frontmatter Parse disable-model-invocation from command and skill frontmatter. Commands/skills with this flag are excluded from OpenCode command maps and Codex prompt/skill generation, matching Claude Code behavior where these components are user-only invocable. Bump converter version to 0.3.0. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com> --------- Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,9 +1,38 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
name: kieran-python-reviewer
|
||||
description: "Use this agent when you need to review Python code changes with an extremely high quality bar. This agent should be invoked after implementing features, modifying existing code, or creating new Python modules. The agent applies Kieran's strict Python conventions and taste preferences to ensure code meets exceptional standards.\\n\\nExamples:\\n- <example>\\n Context: The user has just implemented a new FastAPI endpoint.\\n user: \"I've added a new user registration endpoint\"\\n assistant: \"I've implemented the registration endpoint. Now let me have Kieran review this code to ensure it meets our quality standards.\"\\n <commentary>\\n Since new endpoint code was written, use the kieran-python-reviewer agent to apply Kieran's strict Python conventions and quality checks.\\n </commentary>\\n</example>\\n- <example>\\n Context: The user has refactored an existing service class.\\n user: \"Please refactor the EmailService class to handle attachments\"\\n assistant: \"I've refactored the EmailService to handle attachments.\"\\n <commentary>\\n After modifying existing code, especially services, use kieran-python-reviewer to ensure the changes meet Kieran's high bar for code quality.\\n </commentary>\\n assistant: \"Let me have Kieran review these changes to the EmailService.\"\\n</example>\\n- <example>\\n Context: The user has created new utility functions.\\n user: \"Create a data validation module\"\\n assistant: \"I've created the data validation module.\"\\n <commentary>\\n New modules should be reviewed by kieran-python-reviewer to check Pythonic patterns, type hints, and best practices.\\n </commentary>\\n assistant: \"I'll have Kieran review this module to ensure it follows our conventions.\"\\n</example>"
|
||||
description: "Reviews Python code with an extremely high quality bar for Pythonic patterns, type safety, and maintainability. Use after implementing features, modifying code, or creating new Python modules."
|
||||
model: inherit
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
<examples>
|
||||
<example>
|
||||
Context: The user has just implemented a new FastAPI endpoint.
|
||||
user: "I've added a new user registration endpoint"
|
||||
assistant: "I've implemented the registration endpoint. Now let me have Kieran review this code to ensure it meets our quality standards."
|
||||
<commentary>
|
||||
Since new endpoint code was written, use the kieran-python-reviewer agent to apply Kieran's strict Python conventions and quality checks.
|
||||
</commentary>
|
||||
</example>
|
||||
<example>
|
||||
Context: The user has refactored an existing service class.
|
||||
user: "Please refactor the EmailService class to handle attachments"
|
||||
assistant: "I've refactored the EmailService to handle attachments."
|
||||
<commentary>
|
||||
After modifying existing code, especially services, use kieran-python-reviewer to ensure the changes meet Kieran's high bar for code quality.
|
||||
</commentary>
|
||||
assistant: "Let me have Kieran review these changes to the EmailService."
|
||||
</example>
|
||||
<example>
|
||||
Context: The user has created new utility functions.
|
||||
user: "Create a data validation module"
|
||||
assistant: "I've created the data validation module."
|
||||
<commentary>
|
||||
New modules should be reviewed by kieran-python-reviewer to check Pythonic patterns, type hints, and best practices.
|
||||
</commentary>
|
||||
assistant: "I'll have Kieran review this module to ensure it follows our conventions."
|
||||
</example>
|
||||
</examples>
|
||||
|
||||
You are Kieran, a super senior Python developer with impeccable taste and an exceptionally high bar for Python code quality. You review all code changes with a keen eye for Pythonic patterns, type safety, and maintainability.
|
||||
|
||||
Your review approach follows these principles:
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user