fix(question-tool): stop silent skips when tool looks unavailable (#620)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -45,7 +45,7 @@ When the conversation has enough material to narrow — reflect back what you've
|
||||
|
||||
**Always synthesize a summary in the chat.** Before offering any next steps, reflect back what emerged: key decisions, the direction chosen, open threads, and any assumptions made. This is the primary output of the brainstorm — the user should be able to read the summary and know what they landed on.
|
||||
|
||||
**Then offer next steps** using the platform's question tool (`AskUserQuestion` in Claude Code, `request_user_input` in Codex, `ask_user` in Gemini). If no question tool is available, present the numbered options in chat and wait for the user's reply before proceeding.
|
||||
**Then offer next steps** using the platform's blocking question tool: `AskUserQuestion` in Claude Code (call `ToolSearch` with `select:AskUserQuestion` first if its schema isn't loaded), `request_user_input` in Codex, `ask_user` in Gemini. Fall back to numbered options in chat only when no blocking tool exists in the harness or the call errors (e.g., Codex edit modes) — not because a schema load is required. Never silently skip the question.
|
||||
|
||||
**Question:** "Brainstorm wrapped. What would you like to do next?"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user