voice updates
This commit is contained in:
@@ -22,4 +22,4 @@ This skill captures John Lamb's authentic writing voice for use across all writt
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Principle
|
||||
|
||||
John prizes simplicity and clarity above all else. He writes to convey meaning, not to sound smart. If the output uses words John wouldn't say aloud to a friend, it's wrong. If it obscures meaning behind fancy language, it's wrong. If it sounds like a corporate press release or a ChatGPT default, it's catastrophically wrong.
|
||||
John prizes simplicity and clarity above all else. He writes to convey meaning, not to sound smart. If the output uses words John wouldn't say aloud to a friend, it's wrong. If it obscures meaning behind fancy language, it's wrong. If it sounds like a corporate press release or a ChatGPT default (NO emdashes!), it's catastrophically wrong.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -72,13 +72,19 @@ John writes in first person almost exclusively. He uses "I" freely and without a
|
||||
|
||||
He addresses the reader directly: "You'd be forgiven for thinking...", "You can see if there are any other cars near the spot", "Don't overthink it!"
|
||||
|
||||
## Diagrams Over Walls of Text
|
||||
|
||||
John believes a good diagram communicates faster and more clearly than paragraphs of explanation. When a concept involves relationships between components, flows, or architecture, default to including a diagram. A three-box flowchart with labeled arrows will land in seconds where three paragraphs of prose might lose the reader.
|
||||
|
||||
When the `excalidraw-png-export` skill is available, use it to generate hand-drawn style diagrams and export them as PNG files. This applies to technical explanations, architecture overviews, process flows, and anywhere a visual would reduce the reader's cognitive load. If the output is going somewhere that supports images (docs, PRs, Slack threads, emails), a diagram should be the first instinct, not an afterthought.
|
||||
|
||||
## Structure
|
||||
|
||||
John's writing follows a consistent arc:
|
||||
1. **Hook** — A concrete story, observation, or scenario (never an abstract thesis)
|
||||
2. **Context** — Background the reader needs, delivered conversationally
|
||||
3. **Core argument** — The insight, always grounded in the concrete example
|
||||
4. **Evidence/exploration** — More examples, data, or personal experience
|
||||
4. **Evidence/exploration** — More examples, data, or personal experience (diagrams where visual clarity helps)
|
||||
5. **Gentle landing** — A question, invitation, or understated conclusion (never a lecture)
|
||||
|
||||
He almost never ends with a declarative thesis statement. He prefers to leave the reader with a question or a quiet observation.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user