feat(skills): add ce:compound-refresh skill for learning and pattern maintenance
Adds a new skill that reviews existing docs/solutions/ learnings against the current codebase and decides whether to keep, update, replace, or archive them. Also enhances ce:compound with Phase 2.5 selective refresh checks. Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -89,7 +89,8 @@ Launch these subagents IN PARALLEL. Each returns text data to the orchestrator.
|
||||
- Searches `docs/solutions/` for related documentation
|
||||
- Identifies cross-references and links
|
||||
- Finds related GitHub issues
|
||||
- Returns: Links and relationships
|
||||
- Flags any related learning or pattern docs that may now be stale, contradicted, or overly broad
|
||||
- Returns: Links, relationships, and any refresh candidates
|
||||
|
||||
#### 4. **Prevention Strategist**
|
||||
- Develops prevention strategies
|
||||
@@ -121,6 +122,53 @@ The orchestrating agent (main conversation) performs these steps:
|
||||
|
||||
</sequential_tasks>
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2.5: Selective Refresh Check
|
||||
|
||||
After writing the new learning, decide whether this new solution is evidence that older docs should be refreshed.
|
||||
|
||||
`ce:compound-refresh` is **not** a default follow-up. Use it selectively when the new learning suggests an older learning or pattern doc may now be inaccurate.
|
||||
|
||||
It makes sense to invoke `ce:compound-refresh` when one or more of these are true:
|
||||
|
||||
1. A related learning or pattern doc recommends an approach that the new fix now contradicts
|
||||
2. The new fix clearly supersedes an older documented solution
|
||||
3. The current work involved a refactor, migration, rename, or dependency upgrade that likely invalidated references in older docs
|
||||
4. A pattern doc now looks overly broad, outdated, or no longer supported by the refreshed reality
|
||||
5. The Related Docs Finder surfaced high-confidence refresh candidates in the same problem space
|
||||
|
||||
It does **not** make sense to invoke `ce:compound-refresh` when:
|
||||
|
||||
1. No related docs were found
|
||||
2. Related docs still appear consistent with the new learning
|
||||
3. The overlap is superficial and does not change prior guidance
|
||||
4. Refresh would require a broad historical review with weak evidence
|
||||
|
||||
Use these rules:
|
||||
|
||||
- If there is **one obvious stale candidate**, invoke `ce:compound-refresh` with a narrow scope hint after the new learning is written
|
||||
- If there are **multiple candidates in the same area**, ask the user whether to run a targeted refresh for that module, category, or pattern set
|
||||
- If context is already tight or you are in compact-safe mode, do not expand into a broad refresh automatically; instead recommend `ce:compound-refresh` as the next step with a scope hint
|
||||
|
||||
When invoking or recommending `ce:compound-refresh`, be explicit about the argument to pass. Prefer the narrowest useful scope:
|
||||
|
||||
- **Specific file** when one learning or pattern doc is the likely stale artifact
|
||||
- **Module or component name** when several related docs may need review
|
||||
- **Category name** when the drift is concentrated in one solutions area
|
||||
- **Pattern filename or pattern topic** when the stale guidance lives in `docs/solutions/patterns/`
|
||||
|
||||
Examples:
|
||||
|
||||
- `/ce:compound-refresh plugin-versioning-requirements`
|
||||
- `/ce:compound-refresh payments`
|
||||
- `/ce:compound-refresh performance-issues`
|
||||
- `/ce:compound-refresh critical-patterns`
|
||||
|
||||
A single scope hint may still expand to multiple related docs when the change is cross-cutting within one domain, category, or pattern area.
|
||||
|
||||
Do not invoke `ce:compound-refresh` without an argument unless the user explicitly wants a broad sweep.
|
||||
|
||||
Always capture the new learning first. Refresh is a targeted maintenance follow-up, not a prerequisite for documentation.
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: Optional Enhancement
|
||||
|
||||
**WAIT for Phase 2 to complete before proceeding.**
|
||||
@@ -173,6 +221,8 @@ re-run /compound in a fresh session.
|
||||
|
||||
**No subagents are launched. No parallel tasks. One file written.**
|
||||
|
||||
In compact-safe mode, only suggest `ce:compound-refresh` if there is an obvious narrow refresh target. Do not broaden into a large refresh sweep from a compact-safe session.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## What It Captures
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user