feat: Update skill references from workflows:* to ce:*

Co-Authored-By: Claude Sonnet 4.6 <noreply@anthropic.com>

plugins/compound-engineering/skills/brainstorming/SKILL.md

@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@ topic: <kebab-case-topic>
 - [Any unresolved questions for the planning phase]
 
 ## Next Steps
-→ `/workflows:plan` for implementation details
+→ `/ce:plan` for implementation details
 ```
 
 **Output Location:** `docs/brainstorms/YYYY-MM-DD-<topic>-brainstorm.md`
@@ -140,7 +140,7 @@ topic: <kebab-case-topic>
 
 Present clear options for what to do next:
 
-1. **Proceed to planning** → Run `/workflows:plan`
+1. **Proceed to planning** → Run `/ce:plan`
 2. **Refine further** → Continue exploring the design
 3. **Done for now** → User will return later
 
@@ -187,4 +187,4 @@ Planning answers **HOW** to build it:
 - Technical details and code patterns
 - Testing strategy and verification
 
-When brainstorm output exists, `/workflows:plan` should detect it and use it as input, skipping its own idea refinement phase.
+When brainstorm output exists, `/ce:plan` should detect it and use it as input, skipping its own idea refinement phase.

plugins/compound-engineering/skills/document-review/SKILL.md

@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ Score the document against these criteria:
 | **Specificity** | Concrete enough for next step (brainstorm → can plan, plan → can implement) |
 | **YAGNI** | No hypothetical features, simplest approach chosen |
 
-If invoked within a workflow (after `/workflows:brainstorm` or `/workflows:plan`), also check:
+If invoked within a workflow (after `/ce:brainstorm` or `/ce:plan`), also check:
 - **User intent fidelity** — Document reflects what was discussed, assumptions validated
 
 ## Step 4: Identify the Critical Improvement

plugins/compound-engineering/skills/file-todos/SKILL.md

@@ -185,7 +185,7 @@ Work logs serve as:
 
 | Trigger | Flow | Tool |
 |---------|------|------|
-| Code review | `/workflows:review` → Findings → `/triage` → Todos | Review agent + skill |
+| Code review | `/ce:review` → Findings → `/triage` → Todos | Review agent + skill |
 | PR comments | `/resolve_pr_parallel` → Individual fixes → Todos | gh CLI + skill |
 | Code TODOs | `/resolve_todo_parallel` → Fixes + Complex todos | Agent + skill |
 | Planning | Brainstorm → Create todo → Work → Complete | Skill |

plugins/compound-engineering/skills/git-worktree/SKILL.md

@@ -38,8 +38,8 @@ git worktree add .worktrees/feature-name -b feature-name main
 
 Use this skill in these scenarios:
 
-1. **Code Review (`/workflows:review`)**: If NOT already on the target branch (PR branch or requested branch), offer worktree for isolated review
+1. **Code Review (`/ce:review`)**: If NOT already on the target branch (PR branch or requested branch), offer worktree for isolated review
-2. **Feature Work (`/workflows:work`)**: Always ask if user wants parallel worktree or live branch work
+2. **Feature Work (`/ce:work`)**: Always ask if user wants parallel worktree or live branch work
 3. **Parallel Development**: When working on multiple features simultaneously
 4. **Cleanup**: After completing work in a worktree
 
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ Use this skill in these scenarios:
 
 ### In Claude Code Workflows
 
-The skill is automatically called from `/workflows:review` and `/workflows:work` commands:
+The skill is automatically called from `/ce:review` and `/ce:work` commands:
 
 ```
 # For review: offers worktree if not on PR branch
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@ bash ${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/git-worktree/scripts/worktree-manager.sh clean
 
 ## Integration with Workflows
 
-### `/workflows:review`
+### `/ce:review`
 
 Instead of always creating a worktree:
 
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@ Instead of always creating a worktree:
    - no → proceed with PR diff on current branch
 ```
 
-### `/workflows:work`
+### `/ce:work`
 
 Always offer choice:
 

plugins/compound-engineering/skills/setup/SKILL.md

@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ disable-model-invocation: true
 
 # Compound Engineering Setup
 
-Interactive setup for `compound-engineering.local.md` — configures which agents run during `/workflows:review` and `/workflows:work`.
+Interactive setup for `compound-engineering.local.md` — configures which agents run during `/ce:review` and `/ce:work`.
 
 ## Step 1: Check Existing Config
 
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ plan_review_agents: [{computed plan agent list}]
 # Review Context
 
 Add project-specific review instructions here.
-These notes are passed to all review agents during /workflows:review and /workflows:work.
+These notes are passed to all review agents during /ce:review and /ce:work.
 
 Examples:
 - "We use Turbo Frames heavily — check for frame-busting issues"