john/claude-engineering-plugin
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

refactor(ce-doc-review): anchor-based confidence scoring (#622)
Some checks failed
CI / pr-title (push) Has been cancelled
Details
CI / test (push) Has been cancelled
Details
Release PR / release-pr (push) Has been cancelled
Details
Release PR / publish-cli (push) Has been cancelled
Details

Browse Source 
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Trevin Chow
2026-04-21 14:54:03 -07:00
committed by GitHub
parent bd77d5550a
commit 6caf330363
20 changed files with 756 additions and 122 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

12
plugins/compound-engineering/skills/ce-doc-review/references/open-questions-defer.md
View File

@@ -42,8 +42,8 @@ Fields come from the finding's schema:
- `{title}` — the finding's title field
- `{section}` — the finding's section field, unmodified (human-readable)
- `{severity}` — P0 / P1 / P2 / P3
- `{reviewer}` — the persona that produced the finding (after dedup, the persona with the highest confidence; surface all co-flagging personas if multiple)
- `{confidence}` — rounded to 2 decimal places
- `{reviewer}` — the persona that produced the finding (after dedup, the persona with the highest confidence anchor; surface all co-flagging personas if multiple)
- `{confidence}` — the integer anchor (`50`, `75`, or `100`), emitted without a decimal point or percent sign
- `{why_it_matters}` — the full why_it_matters text, preserving the framing guidance from the subagent template
HTML-comment fields (machine-readable, used by Step 4 dedup):
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ Starting document state:
### From 2026-04-10 review
- **Alias compatibility-theater concern** — Risks (P1, scope-guardian, confidence 0.87)
- **Alias compatibility-theater concern** — Risks (P1, scope-guardian, confidence 75)
The alias exists without documented external consumers...
@@ -152,7 +152,7 @@ After appending two findings in a 2026-04-18 session:
### From 2026-04-10 review
- **Alias compatibility-theater concern** — Risks (P1, scope-guardian, confidence 0.87)
- **Alias compatibility-theater concern** — Risks (P1, scope-guardian, confidence 75)
The alias exists without documented external consumers...
@@ -160,14 +160,14 @@ After appending two findings in a 2026-04-18 session:
### From 2026-04-18 review
- **Unit 2/3 merge judgment call** — Scope Boundaries (P2, scope-guardian, confidence 0.78)
- **Unit 2/3 merge judgment call** — Scope Boundaries (P2, scope-guardian, confidence 75)
The two units update consumer sites that deploy together. Splitting
adds dependency tracking without enabling independent delivery.
<!-- dedup-key: section="scope boundaries" title="unit 23 merge judgment call" evidence="the two units update consumer sites that deploy together" -->
- **Strawman alternatives on migration strategy** — Unit 3 Files (P2, coherence, confidence 0.72)
- **Strawman alternatives on migration strategy** — Unit 3 Files (P2, coherence, confidence 75)
The fix options list (a) through (c) as alternatives, but (b) and (c)
are "accept the regression" framings that don't solve the problem the