refactor(cli)!: rename all skills and agents to consistent ce- prefix (#503)
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -65,8 +65,8 @@ topic: <kebab-case-topic>
|
||||
- [Affects R2][Needs research] [Question that likely requires research during planning]
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
[If `Resolve Before Planning` is empty: `-> /ce:plan` for structured implementation planning]
|
||||
[If `Resolve Before Planning` is not empty: `-> Resume /ce:brainstorm` to resolve blocking questions before planning]
|
||||
[If `Resolve Before Planning` is empty: `-> /ce-plan` for structured implementation planning]
|
||||
[If `Resolve Before Planning` is not empty: `-> Resume /ce-brainstorm` to resolve blocking questions before planning]
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
**Visual communication** — Include a visual aid when the requirements would be significantly easier to understand with one. Read `references/visual-communication.md` for the decision criteria, format selection, and placement rules.
|
||||
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ When requirements span multiple distinct concerns, group them under bold topic h
|
||||
When the work is simple, combine sections rather than padding them. A short requirements document is better than a bloated one.
|
||||
|
||||
Before finalizing, check:
|
||||
- What would `ce:plan` still have to invent if this brainstorm ended now?
|
||||
- What would `ce-plan` still have to invent if this brainstorm ended now?
|
||||
- Do any requirements depend on something claimed to be out of scope?
|
||||
- Are any unresolved items actually product decisions rather than planning questions?
|
||||
- Did implementation details leak in when they shouldn't have?
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user