refactor(cli)!: rename all skills and agents to consistent ce- prefix (#503)
Some checks failed
CI / pr-title (push) Has been cancelled
CI / test (push) Has been cancelled
Release PR / release-pr (push) Has been cancelled
Release PR / publish-cli (push) Has been cancelled

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Trevin Chow
2026-04-18 15:44:22 -07:00
committed by GitHub
parent 49249d7317
commit 5c0ec9137a
233 changed files with 3199 additions and 936 deletions

View File

@@ -65,8 +65,8 @@ topic: <kebab-case-topic>
- [Affects R2][Needs research] [Question that likely requires research during planning]
## Next Steps
[If `Resolve Before Planning` is empty: `-> /ce:plan` for structured implementation planning]
[If `Resolve Before Planning` is not empty: `-> Resume /ce:brainstorm` to resolve blocking questions before planning]
[If `Resolve Before Planning` is empty: `-> /ce-plan` for structured implementation planning]
[If `Resolve Before Planning` is not empty: `-> Resume /ce-brainstorm` to resolve blocking questions before planning]
```
**Visual communication** — Include a visual aid when the requirements would be significantly easier to understand with one. Read `references/visual-communication.md` for the decision criteria, format selection, and placement rules.
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@ When requirements span multiple distinct concerns, group them under bold topic h
When the work is simple, combine sections rather than padding them. A short requirements document is better than a bloated one.
Before finalizing, check:
- What would `ce:plan` still have to invent if this brainstorm ended now?
- What would `ce-plan` still have to invent if this brainstorm ended now?
- Do any requirements depend on something claimed to be out of scope?
- Are any unresolved items actually product decisions rather than planning questions?
- Did implementation details leak in when they shouldn't have?