refactor(cli)!: rename all skills and agents to consistent ce- prefix (#503)

Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

plugins/compound-engineering/agents/document-review/ce-adversarial-document-reviewer.agent.md

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ---
-name: adversarial-document-reviewer
+name: ce-adversarial-document-reviewer
 description: "Conditional document-review persona, selected when the document has >5 requirements or implementation units, makes significant architectural decisions, covers high-stakes domains, or proposes new abstractions. Challenges premises, surfaces unstated assumptions, and stress-tests decisions rather than evaluating document quality."
 model: inherit
 tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash
@@ -78,11 +78,11 @@ Probe whether the document considered the obvious alternatives and whether the c
 
 ## What you don't flag
 
-- **Internal contradictions** or terminology drift -- coherence-reviewer owns these
-- **Technical feasibility** or architecture conflicts -- feasibility-reviewer owns these
-- **Scope-goal alignment** or priority dependency issues -- scope-guardian-reviewer owns these
-- **UI/UX quality** or user flow completeness -- design-lens-reviewer owns these
-- **Security implications** at plan level -- security-lens-reviewer owns these
-- **Product framing** or business justification quality -- product-lens-reviewer owns these
+- **Internal contradictions** or terminology drift -- ce-coherence-reviewer owns these
+- **Technical feasibility** or architecture conflicts -- ce-feasibility-reviewer owns these
+- **Scope-goal alignment** or priority dependency issues -- ce-scope-guardian-reviewer owns these
+- **UI/UX quality** or user flow completeness -- ce-design-lens-reviewer owns these
+- **Security implications** at plan level -- ce-security-lens-reviewer owns these
+- **Product framing** or business justification quality -- ce-product-lens-reviewer owns these
 
 Your territory is the *epistemological quality* of the document -- whether the premises, assumptions, and decisions are warranted, not whether the document is well-structured or technically feasible.

plugins/compound-engineering/agents/document-review/ce-coherence-reviewer.agent.md

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ---
-name: coherence-reviewer
+name: ce-coherence-reviewer
 description: "Reviews planning documents for internal consistency -- contradictions between sections, terminology drift, structural issues, and ambiguity where readers would diverge. Spawned by the document-review skill."
 model: haiku
 tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash

plugins/compound-engineering/agents/document-review/ce-design-lens-reviewer.agent.md

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ---
-name: design-lens-reviewer
+name: ce-design-lens-reviewer
 description: "Reviews planning documents for missing design decisions -- information architecture, interaction states, user flows, and AI slop risk. Uses dimensional rating to identify gaps. Spawned by the document-review skill."
 model: sonnet
 tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash

plugins/compound-engineering/agents/document-review/ce-feasibility-reviewer.agent.md

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ---
-name: feasibility-reviewer
+name: ce-feasibility-reviewer
 description: "Evaluates whether proposed technical approaches in planning documents will survive contact with reality -- architecture conflicts, dependency gaps, migration risks, and implementability. Spawned by the document-review skill."
 model: inherit
 tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash

plugins/compound-engineering/agents/document-review/ce-product-lens-reviewer.agent.md

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ---
-name: product-lens-reviewer
+name: ce-product-lens-reviewer
 description: "Reviews planning documents as a senior product leader -- challenges premise claims, assesses strategic consequences (trajectory, identity, adoption, opportunity cost), and surfaces goal-work misalignment. Domain-agnostic: users may be end users, developers, operators, or any audience. Spawned by the document-review skill."
 model: inherit
 tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash
@@ -66,4 +66,4 @@ If priority tiers exist: do assignments match stated goals? Are must-haves truly
 
 - Implementation details, technical architecture, measurement methodology
 - Style/formatting, security (security-lens), design (design-lens)
-- Scope sizing (scope-guardian), internal consistency (coherence-reviewer)
+- Scope sizing (scope-guardian), internal consistency (ce-coherence-reviewer)

plugins/compound-engineering/agents/document-review/ce-scope-guardian-reviewer.agent.md

@@ -1,11 +1,11 @@
 ---
-name: scope-guardian-reviewer
+name: ce-scope-guardian-reviewer
 description: "Reviews planning documents for scope alignment and unjustified complexity -- challenges unnecessary abstractions, premature frameworks, and scope that exceeds stated goals. Spawned by the document-review skill."
 model: sonnet
 tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash
 ---
 
-You ask two questions about every plan: "Is this right-sized for its goals?" and "Does every abstraction earn its keep?" You are not reviewing whether the plan solves the right problem (product-lens) or is internally consistent (coherence-reviewer).
+You ask two questions about every plan: "Is this right-sized for its goals?" and "Does every abstraction earn its keep?" You are not reviewing whether the plan solves the right problem (product-lens) or is internally consistent (ce-coherence-reviewer).
 
 ## Analysis protocol
 
@@ -49,5 +49,5 @@ With AI-assisted implementation, the cost gap between shortcuts and complete sol
 
 - Implementation style, technology selection
 - Product strategy, priority preferences (product-lens)
-- Missing requirements (coherence-reviewer), security (security-lens)
-- Design/UX (design-lens), technical feasibility (feasibility-reviewer)
+- Missing requirements (ce-coherence-reviewer), security (security-lens)
+- Design/UX (design-lens), technical feasibility (ce-feasibility-reviewer)

plugins/compound-engineering/agents/document-review/ce-security-lens-reviewer.agent.md

@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
 ---
-name: security-lens-reviewer
+name: ce-security-lens-reviewer
 description: "Evaluates planning documents for security gaps at the plan level -- auth/authz assumptions, data exposure risks, API surface vulnerabilities, and missing threat model elements. Spawned by the document-review skill."
 model: sonnet
 tools: Read, Grep, Glob, Bash
@@ -34,4 +34,4 @@ Skip areas not relevant to the document's scope.
 - Code quality, non-security architecture, business logic
 - Performance (unless it creates a DoS vector)
 - Style/formatting, scope (product-lens), design (design-lens)
-- Internal consistency (coherence-reviewer)
+- Internal consistency (ce-coherence-reviewer)