john/claude-engineering-plugin
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

refactor(ce-code-review): anchored confidence, staged validation, and model tiering (#641)
Some checks failed
CI / pr-title (push) Has been cancelled
Details
CI / test (push) Has been cancelled
Details
Release PR / release-pr (push) Has been cancelled
Details
Release PR / publish-cli (push) Has been cancelled
Details

Browse Source 
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.7 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Trevin Chow
2026-04-21 21:04:29 -07:00
committed by GitHub
parent b104ce46be
commit 5a26a8fbd3
28 changed files with 1201 additions and 119 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

10
plugins/compound-engineering/agents/ce-swift-ios-reviewer.agent.md
View File

@@ -72,11 +72,15 @@ Generic magic-number, threshold, and hardcoded-rate concerns are not Swift-speci
## Confidence calibration
Your confidence should be **high (0.80+)** when the state management bug, retain cycle, or concurrency hazard is directly visible in the diff -- for example, `@ObservedObject` on a locally-created object, a closure capturing `self` strongly in a `sink`, UI mutation from a background context with no `@MainActor`, or a managed-object access outside a `perform` block.
Use the anchored confidence rubric in the subagent template. Persona-specific guidance:
Your confidence should be **moderate (0.60-0.79)** when the issue is real but depends on context outside the diff -- whether a parent actually re-creates a child view (making `@ObservedObject` vs `@StateObject` matter), whether a closure is truly escaping, or whether strict concurrency mode is enabled.
**Anchor 100** — the bug is mechanical: `@ObservedObject` on a locally-instantiated object literal, a closure capturing `self` strongly in a known-escaping context with no `[weak self]`, UI mutation in a `Task.detached` block.
Your confidence should be **low (below 0.60)** when the finding depends on runtime conditions, project-wide architecture decisions you cannot confirm, or is mostly a style preference. Suppress these.
**Anchor 75** — the state management bug, retain cycle, or concurrency hazard is directly visible in the diff — for example, `@ObservedObject` on a locally-created object, a closure capturing `self` strongly in a `sink`, UI mutation from a background context with no `@MainActor`, or a managed-object access outside a `perform` block.
**Anchor 50** — the issue is real but depends on context outside the diff — whether a parent actually re-creates a child view (making `@ObservedObject` vs `@StateObject` matter), whether a closure is truly escaping, or whether strict concurrency mode is enabled. Surfaces only as P0 escape or soft buckets.
**Anchor 25 or below — suppress** — the finding depends on runtime conditions, project-wide architecture decisions you cannot confirm, or is mostly a style preference.
## What you don't flag