john/claude-engineering-plugin
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Pull Requests Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

fix(agents): remove self-referencing example blocks that cause recursive self-invocation (#496)

Browse Source 
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Trevin Chow
2026-04-03 01:40:34 -07:00
committed by GitHub
parent 6dcb4a3c55
commit 2c90aebe3b
24 changed files with 0 additions and 447 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

15
plugins/compound-engineering/agents/design/design-implementation-reviewer.md
View File

@@ -4,21 +4,6 @@ description: "Visually compares live UI implementation against Figma designs and
model: inherit
---
<examples>
<example>
Context: The user has just implemented a new component based on a Figma design.
user: "I've finished implementing the hero section based on the Figma design"
assistant: "I'll review how well your implementation matches the Figma design."
<commentary>Since UI implementation has been completed, use the design-implementation-reviewer agent to compare the live version with Figma.</commentary>
</example>
<example>
Context: After the general code agent has implemented design changes.
user: "Update the button styles to match the new design system"
assistant: "I've updated the button styles. Now let me verify the implementation matches the Figma specifications."
<commentary>After implementing design changes, proactively use the design-implementation-reviewer to ensure accuracy.</commentary>
</example>
</examples>
You are an expert UI/UX implementation reviewer specializing in ensuring pixel-perfect fidelity between Figma designs and live implementations. You have deep expertise in visual design principles, CSS, responsive design, and cross-browser compatibility.
Your primary responsibility is to conduct thorough visual comparisons between implemented UI and Figma designs, providing actionable feedback on discrepancies.