feat(document-review): collapse batch_confirm tier into auto (#432)
Co-authored-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -45,8 +45,8 @@
|
||||
},
|
||||
"autofix_class": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
"enum": ["auto", "batch_confirm", "present"],
|
||||
"description": "How this issue should be handled. auto = local deterministic fix applied silently (terminology, formatting, cross-references, completeness corrections). batch_confirm = obvious fix with a clear correct answer, but touches meaning enough to warrant grouped approval. present = requires individual user judgment."
|
||||
"enum": ["auto", "present"],
|
||||
"description": "How this issue should be handled. auto = one clear correct fix that can be applied silently (terminology, formatting, cross-references, completeness corrections, additions mechanically implied by other content). present = requires individual user judgment."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"finding_type": {
|
||||
"type": "string",
|
||||
@@ -97,9 +97,8 @@
|
||||
"P3": "Minor improvement. User's discretion."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"autofix_classes": {
|
||||
"_principle": "Autofix class is independent of severity. A P1 finding can be auto if the fix is deterministic. The test: can the correct fix be derived from the document's own content without judgment?",
|
||||
"auto": "Fix is derivable from the document itself -- one part is clearly authoritative over another, reconcile toward the authority. Includes: summary/detail mismatches, wrong counts, missing list entries, stale cross-references, terminology drift, prose/diagram contradictions where prose is authoritative. Must include suggested_fix.",
|
||||
"batch_confirm": "One clear correct answer, but authors new content where exact wording needs verification. Grouped for single approval. Examples: adding a missing step mechanically implied by other content, defining an implied-but-unstated threshold. Must include suggested_fix.",
|
||||
"_principle": "Autofix class is independent of severity. A P1 finding can be auto if the fix is obvious. The test: is there one clear correct fix, or does resolving this require judgment?",
|
||||
"auto": "One clear correct fix -- applied silently. Includes both internal reconciliation (summary/detail mismatches, wrong counts, stale cross-references, terminology drift) and additions mechanically implied by other content (missing steps, unstated thresholds, completeness gaps where the correct content is obvious). Must include suggested_fix.",
|
||||
"present": "Requires individual user judgment -- strategic questions, design tradeoffs, or findings where reasonable people could disagree on the right action."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"finding_types": {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user